Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive overview of recent U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) rulings and decisions from the past 30 days. The information was gathered from the CROSS (Custom Rulings Online Search System) database and official CBP publications. The database was last updated on November 24, 2025, with 190 new rulings, bringing the total number of searchable rulings to 219,157. The most recent ruling is dated November 19, 2025.
During this reporting period, CBP issued 12 Headquarters (HQ) rulings and 266 New York (NY) rulings, covering a wide range of classification, origin determination, and valuation matters. The HQ rulings are particularly significant as they establish precedent and often address complex or novel issues. This report focuses on all HQ rulings issued during the period, which cover diverse products including medical equipment, leather goods, jewelry boxes, stamps, wine equipment, automotive parts, toys, porcelain tableware, imitation jewelry, textiles, paper products, and footwear.
Key themes in this reporting period include classification disputes involving composite goods, country of origin determinations for trade remedy purposes, USMCA rule of origin compliance for automotive products, and the application of substantial transformation tests in various contexts. Several rulings involve additional duties imposed under Section 301 tariffs on products from China.
Recent CBP Rulings Summary Table
|
Ruling/Case Number |
Date |
Type |
Summary (3 Lines) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
November 19, 2025 |
Classification Ruling |
Medical Equipment Classification: CBP classified an Electron Gun, RF Window, and Ion Pump used in Linear Accelerator (LINAC) cancer radiation therapy equipment under HTSUS 9022.90.95 (apparatus based on X-rays or ionizing radiations). The importer had requested classification under heading 8540 (thermionic tubes) for the Electron Gun and RF Window, and under heading 8414 (vacuum pumps) for the Ion Pump. CBP determined these components are “parts” of the LINAC and properly classified under heading 9022 at 1.4% ad valorem duty, rejecting classification under Chapters 84 or 85 pursuant to Section XVI, Note 1(m). |
|
|
November 12, 2025 |
Origin Ruling |
Leather Origin Determination: CBP ruled that grain splits of bovine crust leather imported from Brazil have United States origin for purposes of trade remedy measures under HTSUS 9903.01.77 and 9903.02.09. Raw American hides are processed (salted, pickled, chrome tanned) in the U.S., sent to Brazil for finishing operations (shaving, retanning, coloring, fatliquoring, vacuum drying), then returned to the U.S. for sale to leather finishing manufacturers. Applying the substantial transformation test, CBP determined the Brazilian processing was cosmetic in nature and akin to finishing operations, thus not substantially transforming the leather, and U.S. origin is maintained. |
|
|
November 4, 2025 |
Classification Ruling |
Jewelry Box Classification: CBP addressed the classification of two types of jewelry boxes in response to a protest: flock-covered boxes (molded plastic with cotton/man-made fiber flock outer surface) and paper-covered boxes (molded plastic covered with paper). Applying GRI 1 and 6, CBP determined the flock-covered boxes are classified by their cotton outer surface under HTSUS 4202.92.6010 (6.3% ad valorem) and paper-covered boxes under HTSUS 4202.99.10 (3.4% ad valorem). The protest was granted to the extent of the resulting net duty reduction. |
|
|
October 29, 2025 |
Classification Ruling |
Postage Stamp Classification: CBP classified foreign postage stamps and first day covers from China and Japan, which are not valid for domestic postage and are imported by stamp collectors and dealers. Based on the General Rules of Interpretation, CBP determined the items are properly classified under HTSUS heading 9704.00.0000, which covers “Postage or revenue stamps, stamp-postmarks, first-day covers, postal stationery (stamped paper) and the like, used or unused, other than those of heading 4907.” The merchandise is duty-free under the 2025 column one general rate. |
|
|
October 9, 2025 |
Classification & Valuation Ruling |
Used Wine Equipment Classification and Valuation: CBP ruled on a used wine bottling, washing, and disgorging machine temporarily imported by a non-resident company for use in both Canadian and U.S. wineries. The machine is eligible for duty-free treatment under HTSUS 9813.00.50 as professional equipment, and also under 9801.00.10 if reimported within three years without being advanced in value or improved in condition. For valuation purposes, the machine may be appraised under the fallback method by adjusting the original purchase price to reflect reasonable depreciation over its seven-year use period, provided this is consistent with GAAP. |
|
|
October 9, 2025 |
Origin Ruling |
USMCA Automotive Parts Origin: CBP addressed the USMCA rule of origin for automotive lamps (headlamps and tail lamps) classified under HTSUS 8512.20 and manufactured by Hyundai Mobis Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. The analysis confirms the goods are originating if they meet the Product-Specific Rule of Origin (PSRO) requiring either a specific change in tariff classification or a change in classification combined with a minimum Regional Value Content (RVC). The holding specifies that the RVC must be not less than 75 percent using the transaction value method or 65 percent using the net cost method, qualifying the goods for USMCA preferential tariff treatment (duty-free). |
|
|
October 3, 2025 |
Origin Ruling |
Toy Build Box Dual Origin: CBP addressed the country of origin for an unassembled disc launcher kit consisting of a motor from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, or Vietnam (73% of total cost) and remaining components from China. Applying the substantial transformation test, CBP determined that adding the generic motor to the build box does not change the name, character, or use of the unassembled disc launcher into something other than a child’s toy, rejecting the importer’s proposed “essence” or “critical component” test. The ruling holds that the countries of origin are dual: the country of origin of the motor and China for remaining components, requiring the importer to break out each component by country of origin on the entry summary under HTSUS 9503.00.00. |
|
|
September 8, 2025 |
Classification Ruling |
Hotel Porcelain Tableware Classification: CBP addressed an Application for Further Review (AFR) of a protest concerning porcelain tableware (plates and ramekins) imported by Front of the House (FOH Inc.). CBP applied the principal use rule, analyzing factors like physical characteristics, channels of trade, and marketing, to determine that the merchandise belongs to the class of goods principally used in hotels and restaurants, not households. The protest was denied, and the merchandise is classified under HTSUS 6911.10.1000 as hotel or restaurant ware, subject to a 25 percent ad valorem duty rate (significantly higher than household tableware). |
|
|
September 8, 2025 |
Classification Ruling |
Imitation Jewelry Classification: CBP issued this ruling to deny a protest filed by Target General Merchandise regarding imitation jewelry pins, which are composite goods made of base metal and plastic enamel. The ruling determined that the base metal component imparts the essential character to the jewelry pins, based on the relative weight and value of the components, the metal’s role in the article’s structure, and consistency with prior CBP rulings. The pins are classified under HTSUS 7117.19.9000 (“Imitation jewelry: Of base metal”), subject to a column one duty rate of 11.1% plus an additional 25% ad valorem duty for products of China (Section 301 tariffs). |
|
|
September 5, 2025 |
Classification Ruling |
Disposable Stretcher Blanket Classification: CBP addressed the tariff classification of a gray disposable stretcher blanket (item 16-10224) made of 100 percent polyester nonwoven fabric and used for patient transport. CBP determined that the blanket’s edges, which are cut to size and finished with a visibly tapered or compressed heat-seal, meet the definition of a “made up” article under Note 7(c) to Section XI, HTSUS. The stretcher blanket is classified under HTSUS 6301.40.00 (blankets of synthetic fibers), subject to the 2025 general column one duty rate of 8.5% ad valorem. |
|
|
August 29, 2025 |
Classification Ruling (Revocation) |
Paper Wine Carrier Reclassification: CBP revoked a prior ruling (NY N077475) and reclassified a paper wine bottle carrier from China designed to hold six 750 ml wine bottles, constructed of non-corrugated paperboard. The analysis, based on GRI 1 and 6, determined that the carrier is a folding box, carton, or case, properly classified under HTSUS 4819.20.00 (folding cartons, boxes, and cases of non-corrugated paper or paperboard). This changes the classification from the previously held subheading 4823.90.86 to 4819.20.00, which carries a 2025 column one general rate of duty of free (duty-free), effective 60 days after publication in the Customs Bulletin. |
|
|
August 28, 2025 |
Classification Ruling (Revocation) |
Winter Boots Reclassification: CBP revoked a prior ruling (NY N336132) concerning two styles of men’s winter boots from Vietnam (the “M Pro Winter Reboot” and “M Summit Winter Reboot”), which are designed for extreme outdoor activities and are crampon-compatible. CBP determined the boots do not qualify as “sports footwear” under HTSUS Chapter 64, Subheading Note 1(a) because they lack the required spikes, cleats, or similar attachments. The boots are reclassified under HTSUS 6402.19.90 (“other” sports footwear valued over $12/pair), subject to a general rate of duty of 9% ad valorem. |
Key Observations and Trends
Classification Complexity
Several rulings during this period involved classification disputes for composite goods where determining the “essential character” was critical. The rulings on jewelry boxes (HQ H325292) and imitation jewelry pins (HQ H343827) demonstrate CBP’s approach to analyzing composite articles under GRI 3, considering factors such as weight, value, and the role of each component in the article’s structure and function.
Origin Determinations for Trade Remedies
Multiple rulings addressed country of origin for purposes of trade remedy measures, particularly in the context of Section 301 additional duties on Chinese products. The leather ruling (HQ H354210) and toy build box ruling (HQ H350263) illustrate CBP’s application of the substantial transformation test, emphasizing that processing operations must result in a new article with a different name, character, or use to change origin.
USMCA Compliance
The automotive lamps ruling (HQ H350927) highlights the importance of meeting Product-Specific Rules of Origin (PSRO) and Regional Value Content (RVC) requirements under USMCA. Importers of automotive products should carefully document their compliance with these requirements to qualify for preferential duty treatment.
Revocations and Reclassifications
Two rulings (HQ H338844 and HQ H338307) involved revocations of prior New York rulings, demonstrating CBP’s ongoing review and correction of classification decisions. These revocations become effective 60 days after publication in the Customs Bulletin, giving importers time to adjust their entry practices.
Principal Use Analysis
The porcelain tableware ruling (HQ H320944) demonstrates CBP’s application of the principal use rule, which can result in significantly different duty rates. In this case, classification as hotel/restaurant ware (25% duty) versus household tableware (lower duty) had substantial cost implications for the importer.
Impact Analysis for EezyImport Clients
Classification Changes Impact
Clients importing similar products to those addressed in the rulings should review their current classification practices. Particular attention should be paid to composite goods, where the determination of essential character can significantly impact duty rates. The jewelry box and imitation jewelry rulings provide useful guidance on CBP’s analytical approach.
Origin Documentation
Clients claiming U.S. origin for products with foreign processing, or claiming foreign origin to avoid Section 301 duties, should carefully document their substantial transformation analysis. The leather and toy build box rulings demonstrate that CBP applies a rigorous test and will not accept “essence” or “critical component” arguments without proper substantial transformation.
USMCA Compliance
Automotive industry clients should ensure they have proper documentation of Regional Value Content calculations and compliance with Product-Specific Rules of Origin. The automotive lamps ruling provides clear guidance on RVC thresholds (75% transaction value method or 65% net cost method).
Monitoring for Revocations
Clients should monitor the Customs Bulletin for revocations of rulings they may be relying upon. Revoked rulings become ineffective 60 days after publication, requiring adjustment of classification and entry practices.
Recommendations for EezyImport Clients
Immediate Actions: Review current classifications for products similar to those addressed in these rulings. Pay particular attention to composite goods, products with foreign processing claiming U.S. origin, and automotive products claiming USMCA benefits.
Documentation Review: Ensure proper documentation is maintained for origin determinations, particularly for products subject to Section 301 additional duties. Document substantial transformation analysis with specific reference to changes in name, character, and use.
USMCA Compliance: For automotive and other USMCA-eligible products, verify that Regional Value Content calculations are current and properly documented. Ensure compliance with Product-Specific Rules of Origin.
Monitoring: Establish a process to regularly monitor the Customs Bulletin for new rulings, revocations, and modifications that may affect your products. Consider subscribing to CBP’s CROSS database updates.
Binding Rulings: For products with uncertain classification or origin, consider requesting a binding ruling from CBP to obtain certainty and avoid potential penalties or additional duties.
Report prepared by: EezyImport Trade Compliance Team
Data source: CBP CROSS Database (https://rulings.cbp.gov/home)
Database last updated: November 24, 2025
Reporting period: Last 30 days (October 25 – November 24, 2025)
Total rulings reviewed: 278 (12 HQ, 266 NY)
For questions or additional analysis, please contact your EezyImport trade compliance specialist.
